The Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on Colorado’s Congressional District 1:
Crime, Homelessness, Mental Health, and Economic Stability
Study conducted by Archuleta for Congress Staff
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to communities worldwide, and Colorado’s Congressional District 1, which includes Denver and its surrounding areas, was no exception. As the pandemic unfolded, the district, characterized by its diverse population and economic inequality, faced severe disruptions that rippled through its social, economic, and health systems. Lockdowns, job losses, rising crime rates, and strained mental health resources created a perfect storm of hardship that hit the district’s most vulnerable populations—children, low-income workers, and small businesses—especially hard.
​
Before the pandemic, District 1 had been experiencing steady economic growth, driven by industries like hospitality, tourism, and tech. Denver’s thriving downtown was a symbol of economic opportunity, attracting young professionals and businesses alike. However, underlying issues such as housing affordability and income inequality were already casting shadows over this progress. According to a 2019 report by the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, a growing gap between the wealthy and working-class residents had made Denver one of the most unequal cities in the U.S. The pandemic exacerbated these pre-existing conditions, forcing many residents into economic insecurity and homelessness.
The stay-at-home orders that began in March 2020 caused massive layoffs, especially in sectors like hospitality and retail, where many of District 1’s low-income residents were employed. At the height of the pandemic, unemployment in Denver surged to over 12%, leaving thousands without steady income. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Colorado saw a 6.7% decrease in employment during 2020, with Denver suffering disproportionately due to its reliance on service industries. Federal aid, including unemployment benefits and the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), provided temporary relief but was slow to reach many of those most in need, leading to widespread financial hardship.
Simultaneously, the social isolation, economic stress, and uncertainty about the future took a significant toll on residents’ mental health. Colorado was already struggling with high rates of depression and suicide before the pandemic, but the crisis magnified these issues. Children’s Hospital Colorado declared a “state of emergency” for youth mental health in 2021, as suicide became the leading cause of death among the state’s youth aged 10-18. The pandemic’s effects on mental health have had long-term implications, particularly for children and adolescents who faced prolonged school closures, isolation from peers, and disruptions to routine care and services.
​
As Denver entered the recovery phase in 2021 and 2022, new challenges emerged. Crime rates, particularly gun violence, increased sharply, with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) reporting a 30% rise in gun-related deaths during the pandemic. The strain on law enforcement and mental health resources has made it difficult to curb this rise in violence, leaving many residents in District 1 feeling unsafe. Additionally, the district’s homeless population swelled as evictions and job losses pushed more individuals and families onto the streets. According to the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative, the city saw a 12% increase in homelessness between 2020 and 2021, exacerbating long-standing housing issues in the area.
​
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the fragility of District 1’s social and economic fabric, leaving behind a legacy of challenges that will require sustained attention from local, state, and federal leadership. As we explore the full impact of the pandemic on this district, it becomes clear that a coordinated, multifaceted response is necessary to address the deep-rooted issues exposed and intensified by the crisis.
2. Pre-Pandemic Economic Conditions in District 1
2.1 Economic Growth Before the Pandemic
According to The Denver Post article titled “Denver's Tech Industry Is Booming: Here's Why It's Growing So Fast,” before the COVID-19 pandemic, Colorado’s Congressional District 1, primarily centered around Denver, was experiencing significant economic growth. This growth was driven by a diverse industry base, including technology, healthcare, and hospitality. Denver had established itself as a tech hub, attracting startups and well-established companies, which played a crucial role in boosting the city’s economic dynamism. The Brookings Institution also noted Denver’s ability to attract tech talent, positioning it as one of the fastest-growing urban economies in the U.S.
The healthcare sector was also vital, with institutions like Denver Health at its core. The healthcare industry continued to expand, providing stable employment and contributing significantly to the local economy. Additionally, tourism and hospitality were critical to the district’s prosperity. Visit Denver's 2019 report highlighted that Denver had its best tourism year ever, with 31.9 million visitors who generated $7 billion in revenue, solidifying Denver’s rising status as a premier travel destination.
​
Despite job growth and rising incomes, economic inequality and housing affordability remained persistent challenges in the district. A 2020 report from the Colorado Center on Law and Policy titled “The State of Working Colorado” noted that while Denver’s economy was booming before the pandemic, many residents were burdened by high housing costs and stagnant wage growth, creating vulnerabilities that worsened during the pandemic. These issues contributed to deepening economic inequality across the district, particularly affecting low-income residents.
2.2 Rising Economic Inequality and Housing Affordability Issues
Despite Denver’s economic growth, income inequality plagued District 1, particularly regarding housing affordability. The rapid gentrification of neighborhoods in downtown Denver pushed housing prices to unsustainable levels for many working-class families. Median home prices in Denver increased by more than 80% between 2010 and 2019, according to data from the Denver Metro Association of Realtors. This surge in housing costs far outpaced wage growth, leaving many families struggling to afford their homes and pushing others out of historically working-class neighborhoods.
​
Rising rents further compounded the problem, as many residents found themselves spending an increasingly large portion of their income on housing. According to a 2019 report from the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, nearly half of Denver’s renters were cost-burdened, meaning they spent more than 30% of their income on housing. This housing affordability crisis was driven by a limited supply of affordable housing options, with new development primarily focusing on luxury units, leaving many working-class families financially vulnerable and on the verge of displacement.
​
While the economy of District 1 was robust in many sectors, these persistent economic inequalities and housing challenges set the stage for the disproportionate impact the COVID-19 pandemic would later have on the district’s most vulnerable populations.
3. Pandemic-Era Economic Fallout
3.1 Job Losses and Financial Strain
The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe economic disruptions across the U.S., and Colorado’s District 1 in Denver was no exception. The early months of 2020 brought widespread layoffs and furloughs, particularly in industries critical to Denver’s economy, such as hospitality, retail, and tourism. The lockdowns and travel restrictions severely affected these sectors, leading to a rapid decline in revenue and forcing businesses to reduce their workforce. By June 2020, Denver’s unemployment rate had surged to 12.4%, nearly doubling the pre-pandemic rate, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
​
According to a report from The Bell Policy Center, many low-income workers in District 1 were disproportionately affected by these layoffs, particularly those in service and hospitality roles. These workers were often the first to lose their jobs and lacked the financial safety nets to absorb the sudden loss of income. Additionally, a study by the Colorado Center on Law and Policy titled “The State of Working Colorado 2020” (published in July 2020) pointed out that the pandemic revealed significant gaps in the social safety systems designed to protect such workers, deepening the economic divide within the district.
Federal Relief Measures and Their Limitations
The federal relief measures, such as enhanced unemployment benefits and stimulus checks, provided some relief, but they had limitations. According to the National Employment Law Project, unemployment benefits were typically calculated based on reported wages, which means that if a worker’s tips were not fully or accurately reported, the unemployment compensation they received likely did not reflect the full extent of their earnings from tips. For many workers in the hospitality and service industries, tips constituted a large portion of their income. As a result, low-income workers in tipped professions faced significant financial strain despite the relief measures, as the compensation they received fell short of their pre-pandemic earnings.
​
While the federal government’s relief programs were well-intentioned, the inadequacies in accounting for tip-based income and the delay in distributing aid, as noted by The Century Foundation, contributed to further financial challenges for many workers in District 1.
3.2 Impact on Small Businesses
According to a report by the U.S. Small Business Administration, small businesses, the backbone of District 1’s economy, were particularly hard-hit during the pandemic. Service-based sectors like restaurants, bars, salons, and retail stores faced insurmountable challenges due to the lockdowns, social distancing measures, and the overall decline in consumer spending. Many of these businesses operated on slim margins even before the pandemic and were unable to withstand the prolonged closure periods.
​
The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) provided some relief for small businesses, but access to these funds was inconsistent. According to the Center for Responsible Lending, many minority-owned businesses in District 1 faced additional challenges in securing loans. The reliance on in-person services meant that many businesses could not adapt quickly enough to survive the shutdowns. According to the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce, hundreds of small businesses in the district were forced to close permanently, contributing to the district’s economic decline.
​
The closure of these small businesses not only led to job losses but also disrupted the local economy’s ecosystem, reducing the vibrancy of neighborhoods and accelerating economic inequality within the district. The pandemic laid bare the vulnerabilities of small businesses in District 1, highlighting the need for more robust support systems for these enterprises in times of crisis.
4. The Rise of Crime in District 1
4.1 Increase in Violent Crime Post-Pandemic
According to a report by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the economic and social fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to a significant rise in violent crime in District 1, particularly in Denver. As businesses closed, unemployment spiked, and social services were strained, many communities in the district became more vulnerable to crime. Data from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation reveals that violent crime surged by 8.5% in 2021 compared to pre-pandemic levels, with a marked increase in gun-related crimes.
​
The social isolation and economic insecurity caused by the pandemic, combined with a reduction in community policing efforts, created an environment where crime could thrive. According to the Denver Police Department’s 2021 Annual Report, Denver saw an increase in homicides, aggravated assaults, and robberies, with many of these crimes involving firearms. This uptick in violence has been a source of concern for residents, who feel less safe in their neighborhoods and are seeking solutions to restore safety in the post-pandemic recovery phase.
4.2 Gun Violence and the Impact on Children
According to data from the Denver Public School District, the rise in gun violence has had a particularly devastating impact on children in District 1, who are increasingly exposed to violence both in their communities and within schools. Since 2020, there has been a 20% increase in weapons-related incidents reported in Denver schools, reflecting the broader increase in community gun violence.
​
Children in District 1 have faced not only the psychological trauma of living in neighborhoods affected by gun violence but also the direct threat of violence within their schools. Reports from the Denver Department of Public Health & Environment indicate that this fear and anxiety are affecting mental health, academic performance, and overall well-being. School officials and community leaders are calling for more robust mental health services, community safety initiatives, and violence prevention programs to address the root causes of gun violence and protect the district’s youth.
​
The combination of rising crime rates and increased gun violence in District 1 has compounded the challenges faced by the community in its post-pandemic recovery. Addressing these issues will require coordinated efforts between law enforcement, community organizations, and policymakers to reduce violence and restore a sense of security for residents, particularly the most vulnerable populations like children.
5. Mental Health Crises and Children’s Well-Being
5.1 Pandemic-Induced Mental Health Challenges
According to Children's Hospital Colorado, the mental health of children in Colorado’s District 1 faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, as school closures and social isolation severely disrupted their daily lives. With limited opportunities for normal social interaction, extracurricular activities, and in-person learning, many children struggled with feelings of isolation, fear, and uncertainty. Children’s Hospital Colorado declared a youth mental health emergency in 2021 due to alarming spikes in depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among young people.
​
The pandemic exacerbated pre-existing mental health issues for many children, while others experienced mental health struggles for the first time. According to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, social isolation, compounded by family economic stress and the fear of illness, created a mental health crisis that overwhelmed both families and healthcare providers. The lack of access to in-person mental health services during the pandemic further worsened the situation, leaving many children without adequate support.
5.2 Educational Disruptions
According to a report by the National Center for Education Statistics, the sudden shift to remote learning due to the pandemic exposed and worsened significant educational inequalities in District 1, particularly as it related to the digital divide. Many low-income families lacked access to reliable internet and the necessary digital devices to support their children’s education. While some schools and organizations provided resources, such as laptops and Wi-Fi hotspots, a report by Denver Public Schools revealed that the demand often outpaced supply, leaving many students disconnected from their virtual classrooms.
​
This lack of access disproportionately affected students from lower-income families, many of whom already faced educational challenges before the pandemic. The abrupt transition to remote learning led to significant learning losses, particularly in reading and math, as highlighted by McKinsey & Company’s 2021 report on COVID-19 learning loss. Additionally, children with special needs or those who relied on school-based support services were particularly disadvantaged, as they lost access to critical interventions.
​
As schools reopened, the long-term effects of these disruptions became evident, with many students facing academic setbacks, behavioral issues, and social-emotional challenges. According to a report by the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, addressing these educational disparities and supporting students’ mental health will be essential to the district’s post-pandemic recovery and ensuring the well-being of its children.
6. The Homelessness Crisis in District 1
6.1 Pandemic-Driven Homelessness
According to the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly exacerbated the homelessness crisis in Colorado’s Congressional District 1, particularly in Denver. With widespread job losses, economic instability, and the expiration of eviction moratoriums, many families and individuals were unable to afford their housing. The Metro Denver Homeless Initiative reported that homelessness in the area increased by 12% between 2020 and 2021, largely due to pandemic-related job losses and evictions.
​
Service workers, many of whom had already been struggling with high rent costs, were hit hardest by the economic downturn, and as businesses closed, the risk of homelessness grew. According to The Colorado Coalition for the Homeless's 2021 report, “The State of Homelessness in Colorado”, the pandemic’s economic fallout led to an influx of newly homeless individuals and families, straining shelters and social services already struggling to keep up with demand.
6.2 Housing Insecurity and Mental Health
According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the relationship between homelessness and mental health is well-documented, with research consistently showing that housing instability significantly heightens the risk of mental health issues. This connection is particularly true for children, who are more vulnerable to the psychological impacts of housing insecurity. Children experiencing homelessness often suffer from higher rates of anxiety, depression, and trauma, as the stress of displacement affects their sense of safety and stability.
In District 1, the increase in homelessness has not only created immediate challenges in terms of housing but also contributed to the long-term mental health crisis in the community. According to the American Psychological Association, many families in shelters or transitional housing face additional stress, leading to deteriorating mental well-being. Children, in particular, struggle with the emotional and developmental consequences of homelessness, making it more difficult for them to succeed in school and develop healthy coping mechanisms.
​
Efforts to address homelessness in District 1 must go beyond providing temporary housing and focus on the intersection of mental health services and housing stability. Without comprehensive support, the mental health toll of homelessness will continue to affect the district’s most vulnerable populations, particularly its children.
7. The Disconnect Between Gun Laws and Public Safety
7.1 Why Colorado’s Gun Laws Aren’t Working
According to a report by The Colorado Sun, despite Colorado’s strict gun control measures, gun violence in Colorado Congressional District 1 continues to rise. The state has implemented several key regulations aimed at reducing gun violence, including universal background checks, red flag laws, and magazine capacity limits. However, these laws have not been sufficient in curbing the increasing rates of gun-related crimes in the district.
Several significant issues complicate the enforcement of these laws, and District 1, located in Denver, faces unique challenges due to Denver's status as a sanctuary city. One of the key regulations is Colorado’s universal background check law, which applies to all firearm sales, including private sales at gun shows and between individuals. Despite this, illegal firearms still circulate within the community through black market channels and other unregulated avenues, contributing to the district’s growing gun violence problem. According to Everytown for Gun Safety, criminals who cannot pass a background check or legally obtain a firearm often resort to these illegal sources, undermining the effectiveness of Colorado’s gun laws.
​
In addition, Colorado’s red flag law—officially known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO)—allows family members or law enforcement to petition a court to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others. While this law has the potential to prevent violent incidents, its application has been inconsistent. A report by the Colorado Attorney General's Office notes that the law remains underutilized in some parts of the state due to a combination of lack of awareness and reluctance to invoke it for fear of retaliation or social stigma. This hesitancy has reduced the law’s effectiveness, allowing dangerous individuals to retain access to firearms.
​
Another layer of complexity in enforcing gun laws in District 1 arises from Denver’s status as a sanctuary city. Sanctuary city policies limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Under federal law, specifically Title 18, U.S. Code Section 922(g)(5), it is illegal for undocumented immigrants to possess or receive firearms. In theory, this federal law should apply universally, but Denver’s sanctuary policies create challenges in fully enforcing these regulations when it comes to undocumented immigrants.
​
Local law enforcement in Denver is restricted from cooperating with ICE on immigration detainers, meaning that undocumented immigrants who commit gun-related crimes are not reported to or detained by ICE for their immigration violations. This creates a situation where individuals who may be ineligible to possess firearms under federal law, due to their immigration status, are sometimes shielded from federal consequences. According to The Heritage Foundation, while local law enforcement can still arrest undocumented individuals for gun crimes, they are prohibited from holding them for federal immigration authorities, which can complicate efforts to address the broader issue of illegal firearm possession.
​
This enforcement gap is a source of frustration for federal authorities, as it limits their ability to detain and deport individuals who are in the country illegally and who commit crimes involving firearms. Sanctuary city policies, while intended to foster trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement, inadvertently create a barrier to fully enforcing federal gun laws. In District 1, this has contributed to the persistence of illegal firearm activity, as certain segments of the population may be less scrutinized for violations of federal firearm laws due to their immigration status.
​
The real-world consequences of these enforcement challenges are evident in District 1’s rising gun violence. While Colorado’s gun laws are robust on paper, the combination of black market gun sales, inconsistent application of red flag laws, and limited cooperation with federal authorities under sanctuary city policies creates loopholes that are exploited by those who obtain firearms illegally.
​
To truly address the gun violence crisis in District 1, these enforcement gaps must be closed. Public safety should not be compromised by policies that limit cooperation between local and federal authorities, particularly when it comes to enforcing federal firearm laws. The Washington Post highlights that sanctuary city policies should be reevaluated to ensure they do not inadvertently undermine efforts to reduce gun violence. If Colorado is serious about gun safety, it must reconcile its gun control measures with the realities of its sanctuary policies. This would ensure that all individuals—regardless of immigration status—are held to the same legal standards when it comes to firearms, and that those who illegally obtain firearms are subject to both state and federal consequences.
​
In summary, while Colorado’s gun laws are comprehensive, enforcement challenges—such as illegal firearms circulating through unregulated channels, underutilization of red flag laws, and the complications of sanctuary city policies—continue to undermine efforts to reduce gun violence. Addressing these gaps is essential if Colorado is to achieve its goal of improving public safety and reducing the prevalence of gun-related crimes in District 1.
​
Nexus to the Pandemic
​
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated gun violence in District 1, as economic hardships, social isolation, and increased mental health issues created an environment ripe for criminal activity. According to The Denver Post, the stress and uncertainty brought on by the pandemic heightened tensions within communities, leading to a rise in conflicts and violent confrontations, many of which involved firearms.
​
Additionally, lockdowns disrupted normal enforcement efforts, as law enforcement agencies were stretched thin by pandemic-related duties and health concerns. This placed further strain on police departments, making it more difficult to address gun violence proactively. The economic and social upheaval caused by the pandemic contributed to an increase in crime, particularly in low-income neighborhoods, where residents were disproportionately affected by job losses, housing instability, and mental health challenges. These factors combined to fuel the surge in gun violence that District 1 continues to struggle with today.
​8. Government Response and Responsibility
8.1 Federal and State Government Accountability
According to The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, there has been a growing movement to hold government officials accountable for the enforcement gaps that allow gun violence to persist, much like parents are held responsible when their children commit acts of violence. This movement reflects increasing frustration with the failure of both federal and state governments to adequately enforce existing gun laws and address public safety concerns. Critics argue that, just as parents are legally liable for their children's actions, government officials should face consequences when they neglect their responsibilities, allowing dangerous gaps in enforcement that contribute to violent crime.
​
This call for accountability has gained traction as gun violence continues to rise in District 1 and other communities, despite the presence of strict gun control measures. Inconsistent enforcement, coupled with legal loopholes such as unregulated private gun sales, has left communities vulnerable to crime. Holding officials responsible for these failures is seen by many as a necessary step toward meaningful reform.
​
Nexus to the Pandemic
​
The federal government’s COVID-19 relief efforts were critical in supporting families and businesses during the pandemic, but they were also marred by delays and inefficiencies, particularly in distributing funds to low-income families and small businesses in District 1. According to The Brookings Institution, this lack of timely aid highlighted broader issues of government inefficiency during times of crisis. As the pandemic placed unprecedented pressure on both economic and social systems, the government struggled to provide adequate and swift support to those in need.
​
This inefficiency was not limited to economic relief. The same systemic shortcomings manifested in law enforcement and public safety efforts during the pandemic. According to The Urban Institute, the strain on public services, including police forces and social safety nets, contributed to a rise in crime, particularly gun violence. The government’s slow response to these emerging challenges left communities like District 1 more vulnerable, as law enforcement struggled to address the surge in violence while also managing the public health crisis. The delays and gaps in governmental response during the pandemic serve as a reminder of the need for accountability and stronger, more effective systems to safeguard public safety during crises.
Conclusion
A Path Forward for District 1
According to The Colorado Sun, the residents of Colorado’s Congressional District 1 have faced an immense and prolonged set of challenges since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rising crime rates, exacerbated economic hardship, increased homelessness, and a mental health crisis that has deeply impacted children and families have left the district struggling to recover. While various efforts—including stricter gun laws, federal economic aid, and mental health initiatives—were implemented, these measures were often poorly executed or inadequately enforced. As a result, gaps in public safety, economic relief, mental health care, and housing stability persist, hindering the district’s ability to achieve meaningful recovery.
​
The failures witnessed in District 1 are not solely due to the global pandemic but also reflect a failure in leadership—at the federal, state, and local levels. According to The Denver Post, while COVID-19 spread quickly, fear should not have driven the extreme and reckless decisions made by state leaders in Colorado. These decisions had catastrophic consequences for millions of residents, and elected officials must be held accountable for the devastation their choices wrought.
​
The lack of foresight, absence of comprehensive impact studies, and unwillingness to consider the long-term socio-economic effects of lockdowns are unforgivable failures of leadership. The Brookings Institution notes that as the pandemic unfolded, business owners, community leaders, and even some health experts urged elected officials to conduct impact studies to assess the costs of lockdowns against their potential benefits. These requests were largely ignored, and leaders instead imposed blanket lockdowns that devastated businesses, displaced families, pushed mental health services to the brink, and endangered children’s well-being.
​
According to The National Bureau of Economic Research, there was no serious effort to evaluate the long-term economic and social impacts of the decisions made during the pandemic. Elected officials, pressured by public health models, imposed lockdowns without considering the broader consequences. The results have been disastrous, particularly in District 1, where the pandemic deepened existing economic inequalities and left the most vulnerable—low-income workers, children, and the homeless—bearing the brunt of the damage.
The Failure of Leadership During the Crisis
According to The National Bureau of Economic Research, there is no comprehensive record of elected officials in Colorado—or anywhere else in the U.S.—conducting formal impact studies to assess the long-term socio-economic effects of the lockdown orders before they were implemented. The immediate focus was on flattening the curve and preventing healthcare systems from being overwhelmed, with little regard for the financial, mental, and social toll these decisions would have on communities. Leaders, particularly in Colorado, chose reactionary and short-sighted measures over careful consideration of alternative approaches.
​
Had these leaders consulted a broader range of experts—economists, mental health professionals, business leaders—the devastating outcomes we now face might have been avoided. The American Economic Association notes that many states, including Colorado, failed to take a balanced approach, opting instead to rely almost exclusively on the advice of public health officials, who understandably prioritized health concerns but neglected to account for the long-term economic and social consequences.
​
Elected officials should have paused and asked: What will this mean for working-class families already struggling to afford housing? How will the lockdowns impact small businesses that are the lifeblood of our community? How will prolonged isolation affect the mental health of our children?
​
But they didn’t ask. Instead, they chose the path of least resistance—blanket lockdowns, indiscriminate business closures, and broad economic shutdowns. Meanwhile, in states like Florida and Texas, leaders took a different approach, considering both the public health risks and the economic consequences. According to The Cato Institute, these states found ways to reopen more quickly, allowing their economies to recover faster and minimizing the long-term damage to businesses and families. Colorado, however, took a more extreme path, with devastating results.
A Failure to Protect the Most Vulnerable
According to The Colorado Center on Law and Policy, the impact of these poor decisions has been felt most acutely by those who were already vulnerable before the pandemic. Low-income workers in District 1 were the hardest hit by job losses and economic instability, while many small businesses were forced to close permanently. The Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce reported that homelessness surged, and the mental health crisis, particularly among children, spiraled out of control. These outcomes were not inevitable—they were the result of choices made by elected officials who failed to consider the broader consequences of their actions.
​
Moreover, according to The Colorado Sun, the rise in crime, particularly gun violence, and the breakdown in public safety have only compounded the problems facing District 1. Despite the implementation of stricter gun laws, enforcement has been inconsistent, and sanctuary city policies have created additional enforcement gaps. These issues, while preexisting, were magnified by the pandemic, which stretched public safety resources thin and left communities more vulnerable to crime and violence.
A Path Forward
According to The Brookings Institution, for District 1 to truly recover and regain its upward trajectory, isolated policies and fragmented approaches will not be enough. A comprehensive, coordinated effort must be undertaken, involving collaboration across local, state, and federal governments, as well as community organizations and private entities. The focus must be on addressing the root causes of these interconnected challenges—whether it be the need for stronger economic support systems, more effective enforcement of existing laws, enhanced mental health services, or affordable housing initiatives.
​
To start, The Colorado Center on Law and Policy suggests that targeted investments in public safety, economic resilience, and mental health care are essential. But these efforts must also be coupled with transparency and accountability from our government officials. We cannot afford to entrust our future to leaders who have already failed us in our most critical hour.
​
The residents of District 1—and indeed all Coloradans—deserve leadership that is thoughtful, prudent, and proactive, not reactionary. The Denver Post notes that leaders who chose the most damaging path during the pandemic should not remain in positions of power. They failed to protect the people they were elected to serve, and the consequences of their decisions are evident in the rising crime rates, economic devastation, mental health crises, and homelessness plaguing our communities.
​
The path forward requires bold, decisive action that prioritizes the well-being of all residents—not just during times of crisis, but in the recovery that follows. District 1 can rebuild, but it will require a concerted, multifaceted approach that puts people—not fear or politics—at the center of decision-making. The people of District 1 deserve leaders who understand this and are willing to take responsibility for the past while working toward a better future.
We must demand more from our leaders—because we cannot afford the cost of their failures again.
